Honest about both. Neither is always the right answer.
AI wins
Standard service engagement, moderate value
A freelance project, a consulting engagement, a design contract. Moderate dollar value, standard terms. An AI-generated draft gets you 90% of the way there in five minutes for free. Paying $500 for attorney time on a $3,000 contract doesn't make economic sense.
AI wins
First draft generation
Every contract negotiation starts with someone typing a first draft. Let AI do the typing. The lawyer's time is then spent on review, judgment, and negotiation — not drafting boilerplate.
AI wins
Speed is the constraint
Project starts Monday. Today is Friday. No attorney available until next week. An AI draft gets you a signed agreement before the project starts. That's better than starting with nothing.
Lawyer wins
High-value, high-stakes engagements
Significant money. Major business relationship. Long-term commitment. Regulated industry. These are the situations where the cost of a mistake exceeds the cost of an attorney. Pay for the attorney.
Lawyer wins
Active negotiation with a sophisticated counterparty
If the other side has an attorney and is negotiating hard on terms, you need someone who can negotiate back. AI generates drafts; it doesn't negotiate.
Lawyer wins
Regulated industries
Healthcare, finance, real estate, employment — industries with specific regulatory requirements where a mistake isn't just expensive, it's illegal. AI doesn't know what your specific regulatory context requires.