Why missed
Saying "two revisions" feels rigid
It seems like you're telling the client they're limited. In reality, you're protecting both parties from a project that drags indefinitely — which helps neither of you.
One more tweak. Just a small change. Actually, can we go back to the first version? Vague revision language turns every project into a treadmill.
Free. No registration. No card. No catch.
What it means
Unlimited revisions is what happens when a contract uses language like "revisions as needed," "until the client is satisfied," or simply doesn't mention revision limits at all. The result: the client can request changes indefinitely, and you have no contractual basis to push back or charge more.
"Can we try a different direction?" after three rounds of feedback. "My business partner had a few notes" after the client approved. "Just a few more tweaks" that add up to a redesign. Each request feels reasonable in isolation.
Many contracts simply don't address revisions. The word doesn't appear. When there's no definition of what a revision is, or how many are included, the default is: as many as the client wants.
Design, writing, video, development — all creative and technical work is revision-intensive. A project quoted at 20 hours can easily run 40 if revisions are open-ended. The rate per effective hour collapses.
Why it's missed
Why missed
It seems like you're telling the client they're limited. In reality, you're protecting both parties from a project that drags indefinitely — which helps neither of you.
Why missed
Does a revision mean one comment? A full redirection? A round of feedback on a deliverable? Without a definition, the scope of each revision is unbounded.
Why missed
Even when a revision limit is included, if there's no process for what happens when you hit it, the client just keeps asking and you keep doing.
What can go wrong
The 10-hour project becomes 25 hours at the same price. Your effective hourly rate drops below what you'd accept if asked directly.
Without a definition of "done," there is no done. The final invoice can't be sent because the project isn't finished — because the client keeps changing things.
The client approved a direction in round one. In round four they want to go back to it. Unlimited revisions means you can't say "that was already decided."
Eventually you stop caring about quality. The work suffers. The relationship sours. A clear revision clause protects the relationship, not just the hours.
Red-flag wording
These phrases are standard in templated contracts and online generators. They feel collaborative. They're open loops.
Red flag
Needed by whom? For how long? This phrase is a blank check on your time.
Red flag
Satisfaction is subjective and indefinitely deferrable. There is no finish line.
Red flag
Whose reasonable? No number, no definition of what counts. Effectively unlimited.
Red flag
Silence on revisions is the same as unlimited. There's nothing to point to when you want to stop.
Red flag
"Minor" is subjective. The client's minor is your major. Define it in concrete terms instead.
Safer pattern
Three elements work together: a definition of what a revision is, a count of how many rounds are included, and a change-order process for anything beyond that. All three are short. All three are necessary.
BizDraft includes these by default for any creative or technical project agreement.
Most affected
Template
Visual work is revision-heavy by nature. Without a cap, every deliverable is open-ended.
See template →Template
"Just one more page" and "can we rethink the navigation" come standard. Cap them.
See template →Template
Solo work, no one to absorb the cost. Revision limits are not a luxury — they're the business model.
See template →Free. Five minutes. Yours to keep.
Draft your agreementRelated risks
Risk
The parent risk. Unlimited revisions is one of the main ways scope creep enters a project.
Read →Risk
The flip side. Client takes forever to give feedback. The revision loop drags even longer.
Read →Risk
When deliverables aren't defined, revision requests are impossible to push back on. They're just "more."
Read →