Can you do SEO for a law firm and their direct competitor at the same time? Can a consultant advising on a merger also advise the other side? Exclusivity clauses answer this — and they should always be priced accordingly.
Free. No registration. No card. No catch.
What it means
An exclusivity clause restricts the provider from working with the client's competitors during the engagement. It's a promise that the strategic value, proprietary information, and specific expertise deployed for this client won't simultaneously be deployed against them. It has a direct cost to the provider — and that cost should be reflected in the price.
An exclusivity clause says: while you're working for this client, you can't work for their direct competitors in a defined market or category. It typically has a defined duration (the length of the engagement), a defined scope (what counts as a competitor), and is priced into the contract.
When a client shares sensitive competitive strategy, market positioning, or proprietary information, they may legitimately need exclusivity. When a provider gives up market opportunities by taking exclusivity, they should be compensated. Both sides need to understand what they're agreeing to and why.
Without an exclusivity clause, the provider is free to work with the client's competitors simultaneously. The client has no contractual recourse if the consultant advising their growth strategy is also advising their largest competitor on the same market. Clients assume exclusivity; the contract should make it explicit — or explicitly deny it.
Why it's missed
Why missed
Many clients assume that hiring a consultant or agency means they won't be serving direct competitors. The provider assumes the opposite — they can serve whoever they want unless restricted. This mismatch creates conflict when the client discovers the provider is working with a competitor.
Why missed
Exclusivity has a real cost to the provider — they're giving up market opportunities. Many providers accept exclusivity informally without charging for it, then resent the restriction. If exclusivity is required, it needs a price premium.
Why missed
What counts as a competitor? A direct competitor in the same city? A company in the same broad industry? Without a definition, both parties will have different interpretations — and the dispute starts from the first concurrent client the provider takes.
What can go wrong
Provider working for two direct competitors receives confidential strategy from both. Without exclusivity, there's no contractual obligation to decline the competing work. Both clients' strategies are now accessible to the same provider.
Provider accepts informal exclusivity — turns down competing work to maintain the relationship. Engagement ends. Provider has declined revenue that should have been compensated in the contract. If it isn't written, it isn't paid.
Client discovers provider is working with their competitor. Assumes breach of an unwritten exclusivity expectation. Relationship deteriorates. Without a clause that says exclusivity was or wasn't included, neither side can point to what was actually agreed.
Provider accepts an exclusivity clause with an overly broad definition of competitor. Suddenly they can't work with most of their target market. A $20,000 contract with exclusive rights to an entire industry is not a good deal unless it's priced as such.
Red-flag wording
These formulations appear in client-drafted agreements. Each one either creates uncompensated restriction or leaves the scope dangerously undefined.
Red flag
No definition of competitor. Could mean any company in the same broad industry globally. Without a specific definition, this clause is both unenforceable and dangerously broad.
Red flag
Exclusivity always has a cost. If it's included "at no additional cost," either the overall price isn't sufficient or the exclusivity isn't real — and it won't be honored if a better competing client comes along.
Red flag
This gives the client the power to expand the definition of competitor at will. Everything becomes a competitor. The provider can be effectively locked out of their entire market.
Red flag
"Thereafter" without a defined end date converts exclusivity into a permanent non-compete. Courts will void this language. If post-engagement exclusivity is intended, use non-solicitation with a defined duration instead.
Safer pattern
A well-drafted exclusivity clause names the specific competitors or categories that are restricted, sets a defined duration (matching the engagement), charges an appropriate exclusivity premium, and gives both parties an out if the scope proves commercially unreasonable.
BizDraft lets you specify whether exclusivity applies, define the competitor category, and automatically adjusts the fee structure to reflect the restriction.
Where it appears
Template
Marketing agencies working on brand strategy, SEO, or PPC often face exclusivity requests from clients who don't want their strategy shared with competitors.
See template →Template
Strategic consultants with access to sensitive competitive positioning often face exclusivity requests. These require careful market definition and clear pricing.
See template →Template
Exclusive distribution rights — territory-based exclusivity — is one of the most common forms of exclusivity clause in commercial agreements.
See template →Free. Five minutes. Yours to keep.
Draft your agreementRelated clauses
Clause
Exclusivity restricts competing work during; non-solicitation restricts poaching after. Both address different phases of competitive risk.
Read →Clause
The information protection that makes exclusivity valuable — confidentiality ensures sensitive strategy isn't shared even where exclusivity doesn't apply.
Read →Clause
State law determines how courts interpret exclusivity restrictions — what's enforceable and to what degree.
Read →